Amazon has advised Perplexity to get its agentic browser out of its on-line retailer, the businesses each confirmed publicly on Tuesday. After warning Perplexity a number of occasions that Comet, its AI-powered purchasing assistant, was violating Amazon’s phrases of service by not figuring out itself as an agent, the e-commerce big despatched the AI search engine startup a sternly worded cease-and-desist letter, Perplexity wrote in a weblog put up titled “Bullying shouldn’t be innovation.”
“This week, Perplexity acquired an aggressive authorized menace from Amazon, demanding we prohibit Comet customers from utilizing their AI assistants on Amazon. That is Amazon’s first authorized salvo towards an AI firm, and it’s a menace to all web customers,” Perplexity lamented within the weblog put up.
Perplexity’s argument is that, since its agent is appearing on behalf of a human consumer’s course, the agent robotically has the “identical permissions” because the human consumer. The implication is that it doesn’t must determine itself as an agent.
Amazon’s response factors out that different third-party brokers working on the behest of human customers do determine themselves. “It’s how others function, together with meals supply apps and the eating places they take orders for, supply service apps and the shops they store from, and on-line journey companies and the airways they e-book tickets with for purchasers,” Amazon’s assertion explains.
If Amazon is to be believed, then Perplexity might merely determine its agent and begin purchasing. After all, the danger is that Amazon, which has its personal purchasing bot referred to as Rufus, might additionally block Comet — or another third-party agentic shopper — from its website.
Amazon suggests as a lot as its assertion, which additionally says, “We predict it’s pretty simple that third-party purposes that provide to make purchases on behalf of consumers from different companies ought to function overtly and respect service supplier choices whether or not or to not take part.”
Perplexity claims that Amazon would block the purchasing bot as a result of Amazon needs to promote promoting and product placements. In contrast to human buyers, a bot tasked with shopping for a brand new laundry basket presumably wouldn’t discover itself shopping for a dearer one, or getting lured into shopping for the most recent Brandon Sanderson novel and a brand new set of earphones (on sale!).
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
If all of this sounds a bit acquainted, that’s as a result of it’s. A couple of months in the past, Cloudflare printed analysis accusing Perplexity of scraping web sites whereas particularly defying requests from web sites blocking AI bots. Curiously, many individuals got here to Perplexity’s protection that point, as a result of this wasn’t a clear-cut case of net crawler unhealthy conduct. Cloudflare documented how the AI was accessing a selected public web site when its consumer requested about that particular web site. Perplexity followers argued that that is precisely what each human-operated net browser does.
Alternatively, Perplexity was utilizing some questionable strategies to do this accessing when a web site opted out of bots, like hiding its identification.
As TechCrunch reported at the moment, that was a harbinger of issues to return if the agentic world materializes as Silicon Valley predicts it should. If shoppers and corporations outsource their purchasing, journey bookings, and restaurant reservations to bots, will or not it’s in one of the best curiosity of internet sites to dam bots totally? How will they permit and work with them?
Perplexity could also be proper in that Amazon is setting a precedent. Because the 800-pound gorilla in e-commerce, it’s clearly saying that the best way this could work is for an agent to determine itself and let the web site resolve.