People typically use one hand to know the department for higher accessibility, whereas the opposite hand is used to carry out main duties like (a) department pruning and (b) hand pollination of the flower. (c) An summary of the strategy utilized by Madhav and colleagues, the place one robotic manipulates the department to maneuver the flower to the sphere of view of one other robotic by planning a force-aware path. Determine from Power Conscious Department Manipulation To Help Agricultural Duties.
Of their paper Power Conscious Department Manipulation To Help Agricultural Duties, which was offered at IROS 2025, Madhav Rijal, Rashik Shrestha, Trevor Smith, and Yu Gu proposed a strategy to securely manipulate branches to assist varied agricultural duties. We interviewed Madhav to seek out out extra.
Might you give us an outline of the issue you had been addressing within the paper?
Madhav Rijal (MR): Our work is motivated by StickBug [1], a multi-armed robotic system for precision pollination in greenhouse environments. One of many principal challenges StickBug faces is that many flowers are partially or absolutely hidden throughout the plant cover, making them troublesome to detect and attain immediately for pollination. This problem additionally arises in different agricultural duties, similar to fruit harvesting, the place goal fruits could also be occluded by surrounding branches and foliage.
To deal with this, we examine how one robotic arm can safely manipulate branches in order that these occluded flowers will be introduced into the sphere of view or reachable workspace of one other robotic arm. It is a difficult manipulation downside as a result of plant branches are deformable, fragile, and differ considerably from one department to a different. As well as, not like pick-and-place duties, the place objects transfer freely in house, branches stay hooked up to the plant, which imposes further movement constraints throughout manipulation. If the robotic strikes a department with out accounting for these constraints and security limits, it could actually apply extreme pressure and injury the department.
So, the core downside we addressed on this paper is: how can a robotic safely manipulate branches to disclose hidden flowers whereas remaining conscious of interplay forces and minimizing injury?
How did your strategy go about tackling the issue?
MR: Our strategy [2] combines movement planning that accounts for department constraints with real-time pressure suggestions.
First, we generate a possible manipulation path utilizing an RRT* (quickly exploring random tree) algorithm-based planner within the workspace. The planner respects the geometric constraints of the department and the duty necessities. We mannequin branches as deformable linear objects and use a geometrical heuristic to establish configurations which are safer to govern.
Then, throughout execution, we monitor the interplay pressure utilizing a pressure sensor mounted on the manipulator. If the measured pressure exceeds a predefined protected threshold, the system doesn’t proceed alongside the identical path. As a substitute, it re-plans the movement on-line and searches for another path or purpose configuration that may cut back department stress whereas nonetheless attaining the duty.
So, the important thing concept is that the robotic doesn’t plan just for reachability. It additionally adapts its movement based mostly on the bodily response of the department throughout manipulation.
Madhav with the multi-armed pollination robotic, StickBug.
What are the primary contributions of your work?
MR: The principle contributions of our work are:
- A geometrical heuristic mannequin for department manipulation that doesn’t require branch-specific parameter tuning or bodily probing.
- A movement planning technique for department manipulation that respects each workspace and department constraints, utilizing the geometric heuristic to information RRT* and incorporating on-line replanning based mostly on pressure suggestions.
- An experimental demonstration exhibiting that pressure feedback-based movement planning can defend branches from extreme pressure throughout manipulation.
- Generalization throughout totally different department varieties, for the reason that methodology depends totally on department geometry and might adapt on-line to compensate for mannequin inaccuracies.
Might you discuss concerning the experiments that you simply carried out to check the strategy?
MR: We evaluated the proposed methodology via a set of department manipulation experiments utilizing 5 totally different beginning poses, all concentrating on a typical purpose area. Every configuration was examined 10 instances, leading to a complete of fifty trials. A trial was thought-about profitable if the robotic introduced the grasp level to inside 5 cm of the purpose level. For all trials, the planning time restrict was set to 400 seconds, and the allowable interplay pressure vary was −40 N to 40 N. Throughout the 50 trials, 39 had been profitable and 11 failed, similar to successful charge of about 78%. The typical variety of replanning makes an attempt throughout all situations was 20.
When it comes to pressure discount, the outcomes present a transparent development in security. Constraint-aware planning lowered the manipulation pressure from above 100 N to beneath 60 N. Constructing on this, on-line force-aware replanning additional lowered the pressure from about 60 N to beneath the specified 40 N threshold. This means that security consciousness via geometric heuristics, which mannequin branches as deformable linear objects, along with force-aware on-line replanning, can successfully decrease interplay forces throughout manipulation.
General, the experiments display that the proposed framework allows safer department manipulation whereas sustaining process feasibility. By combining branch-constraint-aware planning with real-time pressure suggestions, the robotic can adapt its movement to scale back extreme pressure and decrease the chance of department injury. These findings spotlight the worth of force-aware planning for sensible robotic manipulation in agricultural environments.
Do you will have plans to additional prolong this work?
MR: Sure, there are a number of instructions for extending this work.
One present limitation is the necessity to outline a protected pressure threshold prematurely. In observe, various kinds of branches require totally different pressure limits for protected manipulation. A key course for future work is to study or estimate protected pressure thresholds robotically from department geometry or visible cues.
One other extension is to enhance grasp-point choice. As a substitute of solely replanning after greedy, the system might additionally cause about essentially the most appropriate grasp level beforehand in order that the required manipulation pressure is lowered from the beginning.
We’re additionally taken with designing a compliant gripper with built-in pressure sensing that’s higher fitted to manipulating delicate branches. In the long run, we plan to combine this methodology right into a multi-arm agricultural robotic, the place one arm manipulates the department and one other performs pollination, pruning, or harvesting.
General, this work advances the event of agricultural robots that may actively manipulate branches to assist duties similar to harvesting, pruning, and pollination. By exposing fruits, lower factors, and hidden flowers throughout the cover, this functionality will help overcome key boundaries to the broader adoption of robot-assisted agricultural applied sciences.
References
[1] Smith, Trevor, Madhav Rijal, Christopher Tatsch, R. Michael Butts, Jared Beard, R. Tyler Cook dinner, Andy Chu, Jason Gross, and Yu Gu. Design of Stickbug: a six-armed precision pollination robotic. In 2024 IEEE/RSJ Worldwide Convention on Clever Robots and Methods (IROS), pp. 69-75. IEEE, 2024.
[2] Rijal, Madhav, Rashik Shrestha, Trevor Smith, and Yu Gu, Power Conscious Department Manipulation To Help Agricultural Duties. In 2025 IEEE/RSJ Worldwide Convention on Clever Robots and Methods (IROS), pp. 1217-1222. IEEE, 2025.
About Madhav
|
Madhav Rijal is a Ph.D. candidate in Mechanical Engineering at West Virginia College working in agricultural robotics. His analysis combines movement planning, optimization, multi-agent collaboration and distributed choice making to develop robotic techniques for precision pollination and different plant-interaction duties. His present work focuses on department manipulation and protected robotic operation in agricultural environments. |
tags: IROS
Lucy Smith
is Senior Managing Editor for Robohub and AIhub.

Lucy Smith
is Senior Managing Editor for Robohub and AIhub.