Accelerating CI with AWS CodeBuild: Parallel check execution now out there


Voiced by Polly

I’m excited to announce that AWS CodeBuild now helps parallel check execution, so you possibly can run your check suites concurrently and scale back construct occasions considerably.

With the demo challenge I wrote for this put up, the overall check time went down from 35 minutes to six minutes, together with the time to provision the environments. These two screenshots from the AWS Administration Console present the distinction.

Sequential execution of the check suite

CodeBuild Parallel Test Results

Parallel execution of the check suite

CodeBuild Parallel Test Results

Very lengthy check occasions pose a major problem when working steady integration (CI) at scale. As tasks develop in complexity and workforce measurement, the time required to execute complete check suites can enhance dramatically, resulting in prolonged pipeline execution occasions. This not solely delays the supply of recent options and bug fixes, but in addition hampers developer productiveness by forcing them to attend for construct outcomes earlier than continuing with their duties. I’ve skilled pipelines that took as much as 60 minutes to run, solely to fail on the final step, requiring an entire rerun and additional delays. These prolonged cycles can erode developer belief within the CI course of, contribute to frustration, and finally decelerate your entire software program supply cycle. Furthermore, long-running checks can result in useful resource rivalry, elevated prices due to wasted computing energy, and lowered general effectivity of the event course of.

With parallel check execution in CodeBuild, now you can run your checks concurrently throughout a number of construct compute environments. This characteristic implements a sharding method the place every construct node independently executes a subset of your check suite. CodeBuild supplies setting variables that establish the present node quantity and the overall variety of nodes, that are used to find out which checks every node ought to run. There isn’t a management construct node or coordination between nodes at construct time—every node operates independently to execute its assigned portion of your checks.

To allow check splitting, configure the batch fanout part in your buildspec.xml, specifying the specified parallelism degree and different related parameters. Moreover, use the codebuild-tests-run utility in your construct step, together with the suitable check instructions and the chosen splitting technique.

The checks are cut up based mostly on the sharding technique you specify. codebuild-tests-run affords two sharding methods:

  • Equal-distribution. This technique types check information alphabetically and distributes them in chunks equally throughout parallel check environments. Modifications within the names or amount of check information may reassign information throughout shards.
  • Stability. This technique fixes the distribution of checks throughout shards through the use of a constant hashing algorithm. It maintains present file-to-shard assignments when new information are added or eliminated.

CodeBuild helps computerized merging of check reviews when working checks in parallel. With computerized check report merging, CodeBuild consolidates checks reviews right into a single check abstract, simplifying consequence evaluation. The merged report contains aggregated go/fail statuses, check durations, and failure particulars, lowering the necessity for guide report processing. You may view the merged ends in the CodeBuild console, retrieve them utilizing the AWS Command Line Interface (AWS CLI), or combine them with different reporting instruments to streamline check evaluation.

Let’s take a look at the way it works
Let me display tips on how to implement parallel testing in a challenge. For this demo, I created a really fundamental Python challenge with a whole bunch of checks. To hurry issues up, I requested Amazon Q Developer on the command line to create a challenge and 1,800 check instances. Every check case is in a separate file and takes one second to finish. Working all checks in a sequence requires half-hour, excluding the time to provision the setting.

On this demo, I run the check suite on ten compute environments in parallel and measure how lengthy it takes to run the suite.

To take action, I added a buildspec.yml file to my challenge.

model: 0.2

batch:
  fast-fail: false
  build-fanout:
    parallelism: 10 # ten runtime environments 
    ignore-failure: false

phases:
  set up:
    instructions:
      - echo 'Putting in Python dependencies'
      - dnf set up -y python3 python3-pip
      - pip3 set up --upgrade pip
      - pip3 set up pytest
  construct:
    instructions:
      - echo 'Working Python Checks'
      - |
         codebuild-tests-run 
          --test-command 'python -m pytest --junitxml=report/test_report.xml' 
          --files-search "codebuild-glob-search 'checks/test_*.py'" 
          --sharding-strategy 'equal-distribution'
  post_build:
    instructions:
      - echo "Take a look at execution accomplished"

reviews:
  pytest_reports:
    information:
      - "*.xml"
    base-directory: "report"
    file-format: JUNITXML 

There are three elements to focus on within the YAML file.

First, there’s a build-fanout part beneath batch. The parallelism command tells CodeBuild what number of check environments to run in parallel. The ignore-failure command signifies if failure in any of the fanout construct duties could be ignored.

Second, I take advantage of the pre-installed codebuild-tests-run command to run my checks.

This command receives the entire record of check information and decides which of the checks should be run on the present node.

  • Use the sharding-strategy argument to decide on between equally distributed or secure distribution, as I defined earlier.
  • Use the files-search argument to go all of the information which are candidates for a run. We advocate to make use of the offered codebuild-glob-search command for efficiency causes, however any file search instrument, reminiscent of discover(1), will work.
  • I go the precise check command to run on the shard with the test-command argument.

Lastly, the reviews part instructs CodeBuild to gather and merge the check reviews on every node.

Then, I open the CodeBuild console to create a challenge and a batch construct configuration for this challenge. There’s nothing new right here, so I’ll spare you the small print. The documentation has all the small print to get you beganParallel testing works on batch builds. Be sure that to configure your challenge to run in batch.

CodeBuild : create a batch build

Now, I’m able to set off an execution of the check suite. I can commit new code on my GitHub repository or set off the construct within the console.

CodeBuild : trigger a new build

After a couple of minutes, I see a standing report of the completely different steps of the construct; with a standing for every check setting or shard.

CodeBuild: status

When the check is full, I choose the Experiences tab to entry the merged check reviews.

CodeBuild: test reports

The Experiences part aggregates all check information from all shards and retains the historical past for all builds. I choose my most up-to-date construct within the Report historical past part to entry the detailed report.

CodeBuild: Test Report

As anticipated, I can see the aggregated and the person standing for every of my 1,800 check instances. On this demo, they’re all passing, and the report is inexperienced.

The 1,800 checks of the demo challenge take one second every to finish. Once I run this check suite sequentially, it took 35 minutes to finish. Once I run the check suite in parallel on ten compute environments, it took 6 minutes to finish, together with the time to provision the environments. The parallel run took 17.9 % of the time of the sequential run. Precise numbers will differ together with your tasks.

Further issues to know
This new functionality is suitable with all testing frameworks. The documentation contains examples for Django, Elixir, Go, Java (Maven), Javascript (Jest), Kotlin, PHPUnit, Pytest, Ruby (Cucumber), and Ruby (RSpec).

For check frameworks that don’t settle for space-separated lists, the codebuild-tests-run CLI supplies a versatile various via the CODEBUILD_CURRENT_SHARD_FILES setting variable. This variable accommodates a newline-separated record of check file paths for the present construct shard. You should utilize it to adapt to completely different check framework necessities and format check file names.

You may additional customise how checks are cut up throughout environments by writing your individual sharding script and utilizing the CODEBUILD_BATCH_BUILD_IDENTIFIER setting variable, which is routinely set in every construct. You should utilize this method to implement framework-specific parallelization or optimization.

Pricing and availability
With parallel check execution, now you can full your check suites in a fraction of the time beforehand required, accelerating your improvement cycle and enhancing your workforce’s productiveness.

Parallel check execution is accessible on all three compute modes supplied by CodeBuild: on-demand, reserved capability, and AWS Lambda compute.

This functionality is accessible in the present day in all AWS Areas the place CodeBuild is obtainable, with no further value past the usual CodeBuild pricing for the compute sources used.

I invite you to attempt parallel check execution in CodeBuild in the present day. Go to the AWS CodeBuild documentation to be taught extra and get began with parallelizing your checks.

— seb

PS: Right here’s the immediate I used to create the demo software and its check suite: “I’m writing a weblog put up to announce codebuild parallel testing. Write a quite simple python app that has a whole bunch of checks, every check in a separate check file. Every check takes one second to finish.”


How is the Information Weblog doing? Take this 1 minute survey!

(This survey is hosted by an exterior firm. AWS handles your data as described within the AWS Privateness Discover. AWS will personal the information gathered by way of this survey and won’t share the knowledge collected with survey respondents.)