A California jury has discovered Meta in violation of state consumer privateness legal guidelines in a class-action go well with introduced by customers of interval monitoring app, Flo, who alleged that the tech big collected personal menstrual well being knowledge with out customers’ consent and used it for ad-tracking functions.
The plaintiffs, claiming to symbolize hundreds of thousands of Flo customers, had accused Flo and Meta of accumulating personal well being knowledge, like their interval dates and fertility targets, by way of Flo’s app with out permission, subsequently violating California Invasion of Privateness Act.
Filed in 2021 in opposition to Flo, the lawsuit additionally named Meta, Google, and advert analytics firms AppFlyers and Flurry, as defendants, although Google settled the case in July, and Flo additionally did so earlier this month.
“This verdict sends a transparent message in regards to the safety of digital well being knowledge and the duties of Huge Tech,” mentioned Michael P. Canty and Carol C. Villegas, lead trial attorneys within the case.
“Corporations like Meta that covertly revenue from customers’ most intimate info should be held accountable. In the present day’s end result reinforces the elemental proper to privateness—particularly on the subject of delicate well being knowledge,” they added.
Meta disagreed with the decision and mentioned that the corporate by no means eavesdropped on Flo customers.
“We vigorously disagree with this end result and are exploring all authorized choices. The plaintiffs’ claims in opposition to Meta are merely false. Consumer privateness is essential to Meta, which is why we don’t need well being or different delicate info, and why our phrases prohibit builders from sending any,” an organization spokesperson mentioned in an announcement.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 27-29, 2025
Final 12 months, Flo raised $200 million in Sequence C funding from Common Atlantic at a valuation of over $1 billion.