You’ve tried an AI chatbot for troubleshooting, perhaps for scripting. It helped—typically. However your Monday nonetheless begins the identical means: manually constructing lab topologies, writing configurations from reminiscence, and documenting adjustments that no one reads till one thing breaks at 2 a.m.
The issue isn’t that AI doesn’t work. It’s that almost all community engineers are nonetheless on the primary two rungs of the potential ladder.
Three ranges of AI for community engineering


- Stage 1: Conversational AI. You ask an LLM to “generate a BGP EVPN configuration for my leaf switches,” and it provides a generic response—it doesn’t know your naming conventions, addressing scheme, or validated design patterns. Helpful for brainstorming, however the mannequin has no entry to your atmosphere.
- Stage 2: AI Assistants. The LLM good points entry to exterior sources—documentation through RAG, APIs, information. Cisco’s AI Assistant in Catalyst Middle—powered by the Deep Community Mannequin—is an effective instance: it queries your community state and provides context-aware solutions. However for a multi-step workflow like constructing a lab topology, you’re nonetheless prompting one motion at a time.
- Stage 3: Agentic Frameworks. A single or multi-agent AI structure takes your necessities and orchestrates an entire multi-step workflow—utilizing instruments, area data, and your workforce’s requirements—with you reviewing at vital steps. You outline the “what.” The agent handles the “how.”
The soar from Stage 2 to Stage 3 is just not about smarter fashions. It’s a couple of completely different structure.
What makes an agentic framework
4 core parts make this work for community engineering:
- The AI agent is the reasoning engine—an LLM that interprets necessities, reads expertise, calls instruments, and decides the following step. In superior setups, a number of brokers collaborate—a planning agent designs the topology whereas a validation agent checks the output.
- Expertise are markdown information that encode your workforce’s area data—naming conventions, design patterns, templates. When a senior engineer leaves, their experience leaves with them. Expertise seize it in a format brokers devour instantly—runbooks the AI really follows.
- MCP (Mannequin Context Protocol) servers bridge brokers and your infrastructure APIs—Catalyst Middle, vManage, CML, ISE—to learn state, push configurations, or validate adjustments. As a result of MCP is an open commonplace, the identical servers work throughout any appropriate framework.
- Human-in-the-loop gates are obligatory pause factors the place the agent waits in your approval. Nothing touches your infrastructure with out express sign-off. This isn’t a limitation—it’s the function that makes enterprise adoption attainable.
What this appears like in apply
Think about a typical process: constructing a BGP EVPN cloth lab in Cisco Modeling Labs for a buyer proof-of-concept.
- Handbook: 2-4 hours. Incomplete documentation. Data stays in a single engineer’s head.
- Agentic Framework: 10-Quarter-hour. Full documentation generated. Requirements utilized each time.
Engineer request to "Construct a BGP EVPN cloth — 2 spines, 2 leaves, OSPF underlay, iBGP overlay with VXLAN." Agent generates a plan — lab title, 6 nodes, 8 hyperlinks, base configurations, boot order. Presents it for overview.


Engineer evaluations, adjusts the VXLAN VNI vary, approves. Agent executes through MCP — create_lab → add_node (×6) → add_link (×8) → set_node_config → start_lab. Agent verifies all nodes are energetic, BGP EVPN neighbors established, VXLAN tunnels up. Generates documentation.
The agent isn’t producing textual content — it’s executing a workflow. It reads ability information in your requirements, calls MCP instruments to work together with the CML API, pauses in your approval, and produces reusable artifacts.
Constructing your first agentic workflow
You might have the framework—brokers, expertise, MCP servers, human gates. Now you want a workflow: a selected automated course of like constructing a lab or validating a design. Agentic frameworks like Claude Code, OpenCode, Windsurf, and Cursor all help MCP and might orchestrate these workflows. The instance repository makes use of Claude Code to stroll by means of the total sample:
- Outline expertise—Markdown information that seize your workforce’s area data. The repo consists of ready-to-use expertise for EVPN cloth requirements, naming conventions, and IOS XE configuration templates. Begin with one workflow you repeat weekly and encode the selections you make each time.
- Join MCP servers—every server bridges an agent to a selected platform API. The repo features a CML MCP server you may level at your lab occasion. CML is the best start line: low danger, excessive repetition.
- Configure brokers—outline what every agent does and the way they collaborate. The repo features a planning agent that generates topology designs and a validation agent that checks the output. You overview and approve between steps.
- Create instructions—chain the workflow right into a single invocation: parse necessities → generate plan → human gate → execute → validate → doc.
When requirements change, you replace one ability file, not retrain an individual. Each agent interplay advantages from it.


Clone the repo, level the MCP server at your CML occasion, and run your first agent-assisted EVPN cloth construct in below half-hour.
The shift that issues
This isn’t about changing community engineers—it’s in regards to the emergence of the AI-augmented community engineer. AI doesn’t simply pace up execution. It reshapes how engineers design, troubleshoot, doc, and protect data. Specialised brokers can plan topologies, validate configurations, or troubleshoot points in parallel—compressing hours of labor into minutes. Talent information codify years of tribal data that will in any other case stroll out the door when a senior engineer leaves. The engineer’s position shifts from process executor to orchestrator, curator, and decision-maker.
That shift calls for guardrails. LLMs hallucinate—they will generate plausible-looking configurations with mistaken subnet masks or nonexistent CLI instructions. Human-in-the-loop gates aren’t elective—they’re a core architectural requirement that retains the engineer in management as AI takes on extra of the workflow.
Cisco is already shifting on this course—Meraki’s Agentic Workflows, AgenticOps, and the Deep Community Mannequin all embed AI throughout community operations. The method described right here is complementary for engineers who want customized workflows or multi-platform orchestration.
The deeper influence is organizational. Agentic frameworks flip particular person experience into shared functionality. Design patterns turn out to be expertise. Validated designs turn out to be templates. Data that takes months of onboarding to switch turns into obtainable on day one—and improves with each interplay.
Begin small. Decide one workflow you repeat each week. Construct one ability file. Encode what you already know. Run your first agentic workflow construct. The shift from chatting with AI to working with an AI agent is smaller than you suppose—and the influence is bigger than you anticipate.
Join Cisco U. | Be part of the Cisco Studying Community right this moment at no cost.
