Swish Analytics is coping with a a lot wider authorized problem after two contemporary lawsuits landed this week. One comes from OddsJam and OpticOdds as a part of their ongoing courtroom combat over sports activities betting odds. The opposite was filed individually by fantasy sports activities writer RotoWire, which claims the corporate improperly scraped and used its participant information and harm info.
The circumstances add to litigation that started in December 2024, when Swish sued OddsJam and OpticOdds. Within the unique grievance, Swish accused each firms of copying and redistributing betting odds that it says are proprietary. The defendants rejected these accusations, and the dispute has continued in San Francisco Superior Courtroom.
The newest filings introduce new authorized theories and widen the problems earlier than the courts. OddsJam and OpticOdds are actually additionally accusing Swish of violating California antitrust regulation and fascinating in different illegal enterprise practices. On the identical time, RotoWire has launched its personal separate motion centered on the alleged scraping and business use of its sports activities info.
OddsJam and OpticOdds reply to Swish Analytics with antitrust allegations
OddsJam and OpticOdds stated they’ve filed a cross-complaint accusing Swish Analytics of violating California’s Cartwright Act, commerce libel, unfair competitors, intentional interference with potential financial benefit, and breach of contract. Their submitting argues that Swish’s enterprise mannequin reduces competitors by supplying a typical pricing algorithm to a number of sportsbooks.
In keeping with the public model of the submitting, the businesses argue they’re looking for “to place an finish to Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant Swish Analytics, Inc.’s acts of unfair competitors and algorithmic value fixing which have decreased competitors available in the market for on-line sports activities betting.” They contend that licensing the identical pricing expertise to competing operators encourages sportsbooks to put up comparable odds, limiting significant variations for purchasers.
The cross-complaint additionally says OddsJam and OpticOdds assist customers examine costs by accumulating sportsbook odds by strategies that embody API partnerships. In keeping with the submitting, their enterprise advantages when sportsbooks compete by providing totally different costs relatively than transferring towards the identical numbers.
Playing.com Group, which acquired OddsJam and OpticOdds in December, issued a press release alongside the submitting. Co-founder Charles Gillespie strongly criticized Swish’s lawsuit.
“The inexplicable and breathlessly hypocritical lawsuit from Swish Analytics in opposition to OddsJam and OpticOdds could go down as the one largest own-goal within the historical past of the net playing trade.”
Gillespie added: “We by no means paid a lot consideration to Swish, till they compelled us to with their lawsuit. That has now led us to pursue claims in opposition to them for violating the Cartwright Act, California’s premier anti-trust regulation, from their base in San Francisco. The lawsuit that they filed in opposition to us now poses an existential menace to their very own enterprise.”
He later stated on social media that he had tried to resolve the disagreement earlier than it reached this stage.
“Value noting that I began with diplomacy to resolve this case. I flew to San Fran to fulfill the Swish CEO and listen to him out. I tabled a critical proposal to totally handle their issues and resolve the case. I used to be promised a critical reply and bought nothing for practically a yr.”
The cross-complaint asks the court docket to halt what the businesses describe as illegal conduct and award damages for losses they are saying resulted from Swish’s actions.
RotoWire individually introduced that it had sued Swish Analytics, alleging the corporate unlawfully scraped and misappropriated proprietary sports activities info earlier than utilizing it in business merchandise.
In a press release posted Wednesday, RotoWire stated: “Final evening, RotoWire filed a lawsuit in opposition to Swish Analytics for unlawfully scraping and misappropriating our knowledge. RotoWire’s participant harm knowledge, specifically, is the lifeblood of participant prop odds making.”
The writer stated it has spent a long time constructing trusted sports activities knowledge assets.
“For greater than twenty years, RotoWire has been some of the trusted names in fantasy sports activities and sports activities knowledge. Our projections, information and analytics are the product of tens of millions of hours aggregating, verifying and producing the data the trade depends on day by day.”
RotoWire additionally alleged: “For too lengthy, some firms have ignored our requests to correctly license the info we’ve labored onerous to compile. A few of these firms, equivalent to Swish Analytics, even publicly admit to utilizing RotoWire knowledge of their merchandise.”
In keeping with the grievance, Swish operates merchandise that “rely upon the automated and unauthorized assortment of fantasy sports activities information and knowledge created by RotoWire and others.” RotoWire is looking for damages together with court docket orders supposed to cease the alleged conduct.
The grievance factors to claims of automated net scraping and references public feedback from Swish executives about accumulating sports activities info from a number of on-line sources. It additionally cites a job commercial looking for engineers with expertise in “net scraping.”
RotoWire additional alleges Swish acknowledged utilizing RotoWire info with out authorization and declined a licensing proposal in 2025, responding that “we do all this internally at Swish.”
In keeping with the grievance, RotoWire argues these actions disadvantaged it of licensing income whereas permitting Swish to “free journey” on years of funding in creating time-sensitive sports activities info.
The corporate stated in its social media thread: “Our grievance alleges that Swish Analytics unlawfully scrapes and misappropriates RotoWire’s proprietary knowledge to assist inform its algorithms and merchandise. Swish Analytics has been unfairly benefiting from our onerous work, and we now have sued to cease them.”
RotoWire added: “We take the integrity of our knowledge and our platform severely, and we intend to guard it.”
Three lawsuits now encompass Swish Analytics
Swish’s unique lawsuit continues to allege that OddsJam and OpticOdds improperly obtained and redistributed proprietary betting odds by unauthorized scraping and API entry. The defendants proceed to disclaim the allegations whereas advancing their very own claims in opposition to Swish.
In the meantime, RotoWire’s lawsuit focuses on whether or not Swish unlawfully collected and commercialized fantasy sports activities information and participant info with out authorization. The writer is asking the court docket for damages and injunctive reduction primarily based on these allegations.
The claims made in every of the three circumstances stay disputed, and none has been confirmed in court docket. Swish Analytics has beforehand stated the allegations in opposition to it lack advantage whereas persevering with to defend its personal lawsuit in opposition to OddsJam and OpticOdds.
ReadWrite has reached out to Swish Analytics for remark.
Featured picture: Swish Analytics by way of web site
The put up Swish Analytics faces escalating authorized battle as OddsJam, OpticOdds and RotoWire strike again appeared first on ReadWrite.