Huang, B. B., Solar, Z. & Solar, G. Current progress in cathodic reduction-enabled natural electrosynthesis: developments, challenges, and alternatives. eScience 2, 243–277 (2022).
Ruiz, D. A., Ung, G., Melaimi, M. & Bertrand, G. Deprotonation of a borohydride: synthesis of a carbene-stabilized boryl anion. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7590–7592 (2013).
Schlapbach, L. & Züttel, A. Hydrogen-storage supplies for cellular functions. Nature 414, 353–358 (2001).
He, T., Pachfule, P., Wu, H., Xu, Q. & Chen, P. Hydrogen carriers. Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16059 (2017).
Allendorf, M. D. et al. Challenges to creating supplies for the transport and storage of hydrogen. Nat. Chem. 14, 1214–1223 (2022).
Liu, X. J. & Rao, Z. H. Interfacial thermal conductance throughout hexagonal boron nitride & paraffin primarily based thermal power storage supplies. J. Vitality Storage 32, 101860 (2020).
Nicholson, Ok. et al. Boron-catalyzed, diastereo- and enantioselective allylation of ketones with allenes. ACS Catal. 12, 10887–10893 (2022).
Bage, A. D. et al. The hidden position of boranes and borohydrides in hydroboration catalysis. ACS Catal. 10, 13479–13486 (2022).
Mohtadi, R. & Orimo, S. The renaissance of hydrides as power supplies. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2, 16091 (2017).
Grinderslev, J. B. et al. Methylamine lithium borohydride as electrolyte for all-solid-state batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e2022034 (2022).
Orimo, S., Nakamori, Y., Eliseo, J. R., Züttel, A. & Jensen, C. Advanced hydrides for hydrogen storage. Chem. Rev. 107, 4111–4132 (2007).
Zhang, W. X. et al. Current growth of lithium borohydride-based supplies for hydrogen storage. Adv. Vitality Maintain. Res. 2, 2100073 (2021).
Züttel, A. et al. Hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4. J. Alloys Compd. 356–357, 515–520 (2003).
Shao, J. Low-temperature reversible hydrogen storage properties of LiBH4: a synergetic impact of nanoconfinement and nanocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 11252–11260 (2014).
Li, C., Peng, P., Zhou, D. W. & Wan, L. Analysis progress in LiBH4 for hydrogen storage: a evaluate. Int. J. Hydrogen Vitality 36, 14512–14526 (2011).
Orimo, S. & Züttel, A. Dehydriding and rehydriding reactions of LiBH4. J. Alloys Compd. 404–406, 427–430 (2005).
He, T., Cao, H. J. & Chen, P. Advanced hydrides for power storage, conversion, and utilization. Adv. Mater. 31, 1902757 (2019).
Friedrichs, O. et al. Low-temperature synthesis of LiBH4 by gas-solid response. Chem. Eur. J. 15, 5531–5534 (2009).
Fakioǧlu, E., Yürüm, Y. & Veziroǧlu, T. N. A evaluate of hydrogen storage techniques primarily based on boron and its compounds. Int. J. Hydrogen Vitality 29, 1371–1376 (2004).
Puszkiel, J., Gasnier, A., Amica, G. & Gennari, F. Tuning LiBH4 for hydrogen storage: destabilization, additive, and nanoconfinement approaches. Molecules 25, 163 (2020).
Qu, S. Q. et al. Superior reversible hydrogen storage in eutectic LiBH4–KBH4 system through Ni–primarily based catalysts synergized with graphene. Mater. At the moment Catal. 9, 100105 (2025).
Fan, Y. P., Chen, D. D., Liu, X. Y., Fan, G. X. & Liu, B. Z. Enhancing the hydrogen storage efficiency of lithium borohydride by Ti3C2 MXene. Int. J. Hydrogen Vitality 44, 29297–29303 (2019).
Pang, Y. C., Hu, X. C., Zhang, X. Y., Yu, X. B. & Xia, G. L. Two-dimensional transition metal-based high-entropy oxide nanoplates for enhanced hydrogen storage of LiBH4. J. Alloys Compd. 1040, 183613 (2025).
Ding, Z., Li, H. & Shaw, L. New insights into the solid-state hydrogen storage of nanostructured LiBH4-MgH2 system. Chem. Eng. J. 385, 123856 (2020).
Zhang, X. et al. Single-pot solvothermal technique towards support-free nanostructured LiBH4 that includes 12 wt% reversible hydrogen storage at 400 °C. Chem. Eng. J. 428, 132566 (2022).
Le, T. T. et al. Nanoconfinement results on hydrogen storage properties of MgH2 and LiBH4. Int. J. Hydrogen Vitality 46, 23723–23736 (2021).
Wan, X. F. & Shaw, L. Novel dehydrogenation properties derived from nanoscale LiBH4. Acta Mater. 59, 4606–4615 (2011).
Li, S., Willis, M. & Jena, P. Response intermediates in the course of the dehydrogenation of metallic borohydrides: a cluster perspective. J. Phys. Chem. C 114, 16849–16854 (2010).
Calle-Vallejo, F. et al. Discovering optimum floor websites on heterogeneous catalysts by counting nearest neighbors. Science 350, 185–189 (2015).
Calle-Vallejo, F. et al. Quick prediction of adsorption properties for platinum nanocatalysts with generalized coordination numbers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 8316–8319 (2014).
Shang, L., Xu, J. & Nienhaus, G. U. Current advances in synthesizing metallic nanocluster-based nanocomposites for software in sensing, imaging and catalysis. Nano At the moment 28, 100767 (2019).
Zhang, X. et al. Nano-synergy permits extremely reversible storage of 9.2 wt% hydrogen at gentle situations with lithium borohydride. Nano Vitality 83, 105839 (2021).
Zhang, J. G. et al. Nickel-decorated graphene nanoplates for enhanced H2 sorption properties of magnesium hydride at reasonable temperatures. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 2560–2570 (2016).
Liu, J. C. et al. Synergistic impact of rGO supported Ni3Fe on hydrogen storage efficiency of MgH2. Int. J. Hydrogen Vitality 45, 16622–16633 (2020).
Bhatnagar, A. et al. Fe3O4@graphene as a superior catalyst for hydrogen de/absorption from/in MgH2/Mg. J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 14761–14772 (2016).
Johnson, W. A. & Mehl, R. F. Response kinetics in processes of nucleation and progress. Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Petro. Eng. 135, 416–442 (1939).
Avrami, M. Granulation, section change, and microstructure kinetics of section change. III. J. Chem. Phys. 9, 177–184 (1941).
Kempen, A. T. W., Sommer, F. & Mittemeijer, E. J. Dedication and interpretation of isothermal and non-isothermal transformation kinetics; the efficient activation energies by way of nucleation and progress. J. Mater. Sci. 37, 1321–1332 (2002).
Fu, Z. M., Yang, B. W. & Wu, R. Q. Understanding the exercise of single-atom catalysis from frontier orbitals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 156001 (2020).
Łodziana, Z., Błoński, P., Yan, Y. G., Rentsch, D. & Remhof, A. NMR chemical shifts of 11B in metallic borohydrides from first-principle calculations. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 6594–6603 (2014).
Mauron, P. et al. Stability and reversibility of LiBH4. J. Phys. Chem. B 112, 906–910 (2008).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Effectivity of ab-initio whole power calculations for metals and semiconductors utilizing a plane-wave foundation set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Environment friendly iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations utilizing a plane-wave foundation set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, Ok. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made easy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Henkelman, G. & Jónsson, H. Improved tangent estimate within the nudged elastic band technique for locating minimal power paths and saddle factors. J. Chem. Phys. 113, 9978–9985 (2000).
Henkelman, G. & Jónsson, H. A dimer technique for locating saddle factors on excessive dimensional potential surfaces utilizing solely first derivatives. J. Chem. Phys. 111, 7010–7022 (1999).
Nelson, R. et al. LOBSTER: native orbital projections, atomic fees, and chemical-bonding evaluation from projector-augmented-wave-based density-functional concept. J. Comput. Chem. 41, 1931–1940 (2020).
Deringer, V. L., Tchougréeff, A. L. & Dronskowski, R. Crystal orbital Hamilton inhabitants (COHP) evaluation as projected from plane-wave foundation units. J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 5461–5466 (2011).
Dronskowski, R. & Bloechl, P. E. Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids primarily based on density-functional calculations. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 8617–8624 (1993).
Smidstrup, S. et al. QuantumATK: an built-in platform of digital and atomic-scale modelling instruments. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 32, 015901 (2019).